Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36510 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 953 of 2025 Petitioner :- Gyanchandra And 8 Others Respondent :- Kedar Singh And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Nayan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- Azad Rai,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj as respondent no.5 in the array of the parties to the writ petition during course of the day. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-resopndents and Mr. Azad Rai, learned counsel for respondent- Gaon sabha. 3. The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.5/ Board of Revenue, U.P., Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.1271 of 2018 (Kedar Singh and others vs. Gyan Chandra and others), under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforementioned revision, under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent no.5 since 21.8.2018. He further submitted that the copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.4 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously. 4. Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.5/ Board of Revenue, U.P. Prayagraj is directed to decide the aforementioned revision on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 12.3.2025/Rameez Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad