R.S. GOEL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRR/527/2025 · 2025-09-25
Surya Partap Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28935 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28935 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
252
CRR-527-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.09.2025 R.S. GOEL AND ANOTHER
...... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
...... RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Parveen, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Arun Kumar Gujjar, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhimanu Jangra, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH
. J.(Oral)
1. By virtue of order dated 03.04.2025, following direction was issued:-
“Adjourned to 05.08.2025. It is clarified that in case the remaining payment of Rs.7,00,000/- is not paid by the petitioner No.1 to respondent No.2, the present petition shall be deemed to be dismissed.”
2. Today counsel for both the parties have submitted that the petitioners have not complied with the abovementioned directions, and that out of Rs.9,00,000/-, only Rs.2,00,000/- have been paid by the petitioners.
VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.29 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order
CRR-527-2025 (O&M) 2
3. In view of order dated 03.04.2025, once the compliance has not been made, the present petition is bound to be dismissed on account of non-compliance. Hence the same is hereby dismissed accordingly.
4. Intimation in this regard be sent to the learned trial Court.
5. All other pending applications, if any, are also disposed off, accordingly.
(SURYA PARTAP SINGH)
JUDGE 25.09.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable : No
VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.29 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order