Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28934 (BOM)

JYOTI SHRIKRUSHNA KADAM v. SHRIKRUSHNA KACHARU KADAM

WP/11243/2023 · 2025-01-09

Shri Kishore C Sant

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ethape ( 1 ) 936 WP-11243-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 936 WRIT PETITION NO. 11243 OF 2023 Jyoti Shrikrushna Kadam VERSUS Shrikrushna Kacharu Kadam ... Ms. Suvarna M.Zaware, Advocate for the Petitioner. Adv. P. N. Kalani and S. S. Katariya for Respondent. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 9th JANUARY 2025 PC :- 1. Learned Advocate for the Respondent raises preliminary objection that the writ petition is not maintainable in view of remedy provided under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. 2. In view of the same, the learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal. 3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed for. 4. Petition stands disposed off as withdrawn. 5. It is made clear that while calculating the period of limitation, the Ethape ( 2 ) 936 WP-11243-2023 period of pendency of the writ petition before this Court shall be excluded. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]