- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22149 WP No. 17250 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 17250 OF 2025 (MV) BETWEEN: SRI. S.C.SRINIVASA S/O S.CHANDRASHEKARIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/A 353, 10TH MAIN, POORNA PRAGNA HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED, UTTARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560 061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.LOKESH., ADVOCATE) AND: THE KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, I FLOOR, 'A' BLOCK, TTMC, BMTC BUILDINGS, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 027. BY ITS SECRETARY. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR.M., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22149 WP No. 17250 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.R.Lokesh., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Rajakumar.M., AGA for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to set aside the common resolution taken by the respondent authority so far as petitioner subject number 64/2024 at Sl.No.204 dated:22.01.2025 decision pronounced on 07.04.2025 vide Annexure-D to the Writ Petition and direct the respondent authority to consider the material furnished and to consider the subject individually in respect of each permit and to take decision with in 2 months from the date of receipt of the direction/ order in the above Writ Petition. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that the KSTA instead of deciding the application, simply deferred the matter - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22149 WP No. 17250 of 2025 by passing a resolution. Under these circumstances the petitioner is before this Court. AGA on instructions submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, the applications were not considered and hence, the matter was deferred. AGA therefore, submits that if a direction is issued to the authority to consider the applications, the same would be adhered to. The oral submission made by AGA is placed on record. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent - authority to consider the applications in accordance with law, within two months from the receipt of certified copy of this order. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14