Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2893 (CHH)

YAGYADUTT SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/256/2021 · 2025-04-16

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17510 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 256 of 2021 • Yagyadutt Sharma S/o Late Rameshwar Prasad Sharma Aged About 56 Years R/o Sadar Road Baold, Tahsil And District Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Cooperative Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Registrar Co-Operativce Societies Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 3. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce Union, Vandhan Bhawan, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Executive Director Cum Registrar Chhattisgarh State Minor Forest Produce Union, Vandhan Bhawan, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5. Deputy Managing Director, District Minor Forest Produce Cooperative Union, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Abhishek Thakur, Advocate For Respondents No. 1 & 2 For Respondents No. 3 to 5 : : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the case pertaining to the petitioner. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ quashing the order dated 01.12.2020 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deem-fit and appropriate.” 2. At the very outset, Ms. Priyanka Rai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Ms. Priyanka Rai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti