Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28915 (MAD)

RAMIYA v. State by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/5098/2025 · 2025-03-10

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 1. RAMIYA S/o Ganesan No.5-256, Om Santhi Nagar, Mookandapalli, Hosur, Krishangiri District 2.The Inspector Of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District The Inspector Of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District petitioners(s) Vs 1. State by, The Inspector of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District (Crime No. 33 of 2025)5- 256,oM SANTHI NAGAR, MOOKANDAPALLI, HOSUR, KRISHANGIRI DISTRICT Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to enlarge the petitioners / Accused on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in Crime No. 33 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For petitioners(s): P M Jayachandran For Respondent(s): Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 194 of the BNSS Act altered under Section 108 and 56 of the BNS Act in Crime No. 33 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant is the wife of the deceased; that the deceased had agreed to execute a sale deed in respect of the property to one Ramiya; that thereafter, he could not execute the sale deed; that the said Ramiya had taken the deceased for negotiation saying that the negotiation would be had at the police station; that thereafter, he took the deceased to the petitioners; that after the deceased met the petitioners and the said Ramaiya, he came back and committed suicide. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and in any case, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that case has been registered under Section 194 of the BNSS and the offences have not been altered so far as. 5. In view of the same, the respondent shall conduct an enquiry and complete the same, within a period of three weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 10-03-2025 vca https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN,J. vca To 1.State by, The Inspector of Police, Royakottai Police Station, Krishnagiri District (Crime No. 33 of 2025)5- 256,oM SANTHI NAGAR, MOOKANDAPALLI, HOSUR, KRISHANGIRI DISTRICT CRL OP No. 5098 of 2025 10.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis