Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28915 (BOM)

KACHARU SAHEBRAO THOSAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA,THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR

CA/10733/2024 · 2025-07-31

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 953(i).CA-10733-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10733 OF 2024 IN FAST/26613/2024 KACHARU SAHEBRAO THOSAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ANR ... Advocate for the Applicant : Mr.Bide Dnyaneshwar A AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.D.B.Bhange Advocate for Respondent No.2 :Mr.B.V. Virdhe … CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 31st JULY 2025 PER COURT : . Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. For the reasons stated in the application which are not controverted by the contesting party, delay stands condoned. 3. Civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. 4. The applicant shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the period of delay. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj.. 2025:BHC-AUG:20442