Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28911 (AP)

OLETI RUPENDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21299/2025 · 2025-09-07

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010412192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY WRIT PETITION NO: 21299 OF i'i.' VIJAY Between: Oleti Rupendra Kumar, S/o. Home Guard, Krishna District. late Nageswar Rao, Aged about 34 years, Occ Chinnavulingipalem, Machilipatnam, R/o. D. No. 30/700, ...PETITIONER AND 1- The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, AP. 2. The Director General of Police Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. State Level Police Recruitment Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Board, Rep. by its Chairman ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the pleased to issue a writ order or direction High Court may be more particularly one in the nature the action of the 3'^^ of writ of Mandamus, declaring selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket Constable (civil) as he is eligible Quota, despite the respondent in not no. 5977110882) to the post of Police per his merit under the Home Guard as vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3'"^ respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated ■ in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3"'^ respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, pursuant to the notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following order: APHC010412192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 21299/2025 Between: 1.0LETI RUPENDRA KUMAR, S/0. LATE NAGESWAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC HOME GUARD, R/0. D. NO. 30/700, CHINNAVULINGIPALEM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AP. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, REP. BY ITS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA CHAIRMAN, PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not selecting the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible as per his merit under the Home Guard Quota, despite the vacancies are there pursuant to the notification dt.28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, is illegal, arbitrary and Unconstitutional and 2 consequently direct the 3'" respondent to issue the appointment order to the petitioner and pass such lA NO: 1 OF 2C)7R Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stated ; support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased y be pleased to direct the 3' respondent to select the petitioner (Hall Ticket no. 5977110882) to the post of Police Constable (civil) as he is eligible 28 'he notification dt. 28-11-2022, in Vijayawada city or Krishna District, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.21299 of 2025 ORDER: Sri I.Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 03.09.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial) seeking permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present petition. 2. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGfStRAR SECtlC^^QFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri Koti Reddy Idamakanti, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Services-I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:08/09/2025 ORDER WP No. 21299 OF 2025 15 SEP 2025 ^ . Current Section . ^ e? o a: m O Co A’ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS