AKSHAY GURJAR S/O SHRI BABULAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10944/2025 · 2025-09-18
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28905 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28905 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:38335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10944/2025 Akshay Gurjar S/o Shri Babulal Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o House No. 42, Luvkush Nagar, Mangyawas, Police Station Mansarovar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Paliwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP, Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt.G.A. and Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma, Adv., for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 18/09/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.685/2025 registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 126(2) & 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Section 3/25 of Arms Act.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.
Learned counsel submits that there is omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that there are no
[2025:RJ-JP:38335] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10944/2025] criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the injured does not dispute the factum of compromise.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that there is omnibus allegation against the petitioner; dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Akshay Gurjar S/o Shri Babulal Gurjar shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
[2025:RJ-JP:38335] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10944/2025]
7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/178