Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28895 (AP)

A LAKSHMAMMA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21349/2025 · 2025-08-13

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010412412025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21349/2025 Between: 1. A LAKSHMAMMA, W/O. K. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.15-5-4-4-6, R.R.S. COLONY, AT BAPUJI PARK, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, NELAPADU, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. (CHITTOOR DISTRICT) 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, MADANAPALLE MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or orders especially in the form of Writ of MANDAMUS by declare a)The action of the respondents in deleting my absolute property for an extent of Ac. 17.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 24/15 and Ac. 27.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 23/15 in Ankisettypalle Village, Madanapalli Mandal, Annamayya District from my khata (A/c) No. 123 without issuing notice to me unilaterally as illegal, arbitrary unjust without following due process of law violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, 21, violation of property right guaranteed under Article 300- A of constitution and illegal, arbitrary and just and consequently direct the respondents to re-enter my absolute property for extent of Ac. 17.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 24/15 and Ac. 27.00 cents in Sy.No. 23/15 in Ankisettypalle Village, Madanapalli Mandal, Annamayya District in my Khata / Patta No. 123 and pass such other or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, b) Declare the action of the respondents in changing the nature of my absolute Private Patta Land for an extent of Ac. 58.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 30/1, Ac.6300 cents situated in Sy.No. 24/4 of 2 Ankisettypalle Village, Madanapalle Mandal as assigned and notifying those properties in the list of prohibitory properties under section 22-A of registration Act without issuing notice to as illegal, arbitrary unjust violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 19, 21, violation of property right guaranteed under Article 300-A of constitution and illegal, arbitrary and just and consequently direct the respondents to denotify my absolute private property for an extent of Ac. 58.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 30/1, Ac. 63.00 cents situated in Sy.No. 24/4 of Ankisettypalle Village, Madanapalle Mandal from the list of prohibitory properties and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent not to interfere my peaceful possession and enjoyment from an extent of Ac.17.00 cents situated in Sy.No.24/15 and Ac.27.00 cents situated in Sy.No.23/15 in Ankisettypalle Village, Madanapalli Mandal, Annamayya District from my khata (A/c) No.123 without following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21349 of 2025 ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that typographical errors had crept in the affidavit and therefore, sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file fresh writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file fresh writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 14.08.2025 KBN