Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28893 (RAJ)

HARJIRAM SON OF SHRI GOPIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLR/1558/2022 · 2025-08-26

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33813] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1558/2022 1. Harjiram son of Shri Gopiram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, Post Pawalia, P.S Sez Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 2. Ramlal Son Of Shri Gopiram, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, Post Pawalia, P.S Sez Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 3. Ramotar @ Ramavtar Son Of Shri Harjiram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, Post Pawalia, P.S Sez Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 4. Rajaram Son Of Shri Ramlal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, Post Pawalia, P.S. Sez Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur 5. Ramkalyan Son Of Shri Harjiram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, Post Pawalia, P.S Sez Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur ----Petitioners/accused Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor 2. Nathuram Son Of Bholaram, Aged About 75 Years, R/o Village Chatarpura, P.S. Sez, Jaipur City West ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narayan Chaudhary, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 26/08/2025 : After having argued the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise all his objections/grounds before the ld. Trial Court at appropriate stage. Permission, as sought for is granted. [2025:RJ-JP:33813] (2 of 2) [CRLR-1558/2022] The revision petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to raise all his objections/grounds before the ld. Trial Court at the time of final arguments. The ld. Trial Court shall pass an order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to both the parties Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J. ashok-MANOJ ADWANI /36