APHC010413092011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13358/2011 Between: 1. KOVVURI RAMA DEVI, CHINTALAPUDI, R/O. 9-146, N.V.NAGAR COLONY, CHINTHALAPUDI, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVT OF A P., MH DEPT., ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534 001. 2. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL HEALTH OFFIER, WEST GODAVARI AT ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534 001. 3. M KRISHNMA KUMARI D/O CHINA VENKATESHU, R/O PRAGADAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH 4. S JHANSI D/O NAGESHWARA RAO, R/O. SETTIVARIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE GOVT OF A P, REP BYITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M & H DEPT., SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD - 500 022. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No.1,2 and 3 to act as per the law and appoint the Applicant herein, to one of the two posts vacant in S.C category of SECOND ANM/MPHA (F) in P.H.C, Raghavapuram, West Godavari District, who had secured more marks than the Respondent No.3 and 4. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 16208 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 keep one post vacant in the Open category of the post Second ANM/MPHA (F) in 2 P.H.C, Potunuru, Chinthalpudi Mandal, West Godavari District pending disposal of the main petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D VIJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 13358 of 2011 ORDER: Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It evinces that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting her case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date : 04.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Writ Petition No:13358 of 2011 Date : 04.07.2025 SPP