- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5206 WP No. 100404 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 100404 OF 2022 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: CHANNAMMA MOTORS, P.B.ROAD, VIDYA NAGAR, HUBLI, BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON, MR. PRABHAKAR S/O BHIMARADDI MAIDUR, AGEL: 40 YEARS, OCC: MANAGER, R/O: SHIRASHER BUILDING, 1ST CROSS, SIDDHARUDHA NAGAR, RANEBENNUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581 115. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. VEERESH GADDADA, ADVOCATE[ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. RAVINDRANAIK @ RAVINAIK S/O BHIMANAIK, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND COOLI, R/O: DOMBRAHALLI THANDA, TQ: HOVIN HADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI, NOW R/O: KAMADOD, TQ:. RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI-581 145. 2. MR. SHANKARAPPA S/O THOTEPPA LAMANI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/O: DOMBRAHALLI THANDA, TQ: HADAGALI, DIST. BELLARY-583 219. 3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, ORIENTAL GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., ENKAY COMPLEX, KESHWAPUR, HUBLI-580 023. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5206 WP No. 100404 of 2022 4. BAJAJ FINANCE LTD., 74, NEAR MINI FOREST, SARKKI INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, 3RD PHASE, BENGALURU-78. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented, either personally or through video conferencing. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the petition was listed on 11.03.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the petition under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’ on 21.03.2025. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5206 WP No. 100404 of 2022 The petition is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of petition for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In view of peremptory order dated 11.03.2025, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections and also for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,RH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45