Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28889 (CHH)

OM PRAKASH SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5068/2018 · 2025-02-04

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:6346 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5068 of 2018 Om Prakash Singh S/o Late Shri T R Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o C I D C Colony , Qtr. No. A/2, In Front Of Irrigation Colony Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1- State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Nagri Nikay, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralay, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2- Commissioner ( Pension ) Urban Administration And Development Department Directorate Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3- Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Dipka, District Korba Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Raghvendra Verma, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Ravish Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapti, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04 .02.2025 1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition has already been redressed, but the respondent authorities have not paid the interest of delayed payment. 2) On the other hand, learned State counsel would submit that in this writ petition, nothing survives for adjudication as grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 3) Taking into consideration the fact the payment of retirement has already been paid to -2- the petitioner and pension has already been fixed, therefore, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, this petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take suitable steps claiming therein interest on amount of delayed payment. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim