GIRIRAJ JANGID S/O RAMDHAN JANGID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10624/2024 · 2025-01-03
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28888 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28888 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:444] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10624/2024 Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village House No. 38 A, Heerapura Dhawas, P.s. Karni Vihar, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP, Ms. Anisha Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 03/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.1156/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The matter is triable by Magistrate and charge-sheet has already been produced before this Court. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:444] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10624/2024]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant vehemently oppose the bail application and contended that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and he was found to be involved in five cases of similar nature, therefore the bail application of the accused- petitioner deserves to be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on merits of the case and considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid in connection FIR No.1156/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/135