Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28887 (AP)

KANDULA SEETHAMAHALAXMI v. KANDULA VEERRAJU @BABU RAO

CMA/1350/2008 · 2025-08-05

Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010412582008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1350 OF 2008 Between: Kandula Seethamahalaxmi, W/o Veerraju, 45 years, R/o Amalapuram, East Godavari District. ...Appellant AND Kandula Veerraju @ Babu Rao, S/o Reddemma, 48 years, R/o I.Cheruvu, H/o Mokkalathippa, Katrenikona Mandal, East Godavari District. ...Respondent Counsel for the Appellant : Mr.T V S Prabhakara Rao Counsel for the Respondent : Mr.K Venkatesh The Court made the following JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble NJS,J) At the time of considering the matter, it is represented on behalf of the appellant that the respondent–husband, who obtained the decree for divorce died during the pendency of the appeal and no orders are necessary. 2. Since no steps have been taken to bring the Legal Representative(s) of the deceased respondent on record, in view of the death of the respondent, the C.M.A., is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, including I.A. No.4 of 2008, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J _____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J August 06, 2025 vasu