Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28883 (RAJ)

RAM NIWAS (SINCE DECEASED) v. SURESH CHAND SHARMA SON OF LATE SHRI BAJRANG LAL SHARMA

CW/14619/2020 · 2025-05-21

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21387] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14619/2020 1. Ram Niwas (Since Deceased), Aged About 67 Years, Now Represented By His Following Legal Representatives 2. Gulab Devi Wife Of Late Shri Ram Niwas Mali, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Khawa, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 3. Hanuman Mali Son Of Late Shri Ram Niwas Mali, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Village Khawa, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 4. Ramcharan Mali Son Of Late Shri Ram Niwas Mali, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Khawa, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 5. Rajendra Mali Son Of Late Shri Ram Niwas Mali, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Khawa, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 6. Anita D/o Late Shri Ramniwas Mali And Wife Of Sheopal Mali, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Dhanoli, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. Suresh Chand Sharma Son Of Late Shri Bajrang Lal Sharma, Resident Of Village Khilchipur, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 2. Udai Chand Sharma Son Of Late Shri Bajrang Lal Sharma, Resident Of Village Khilchipur, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 3. Mahesh Chand Sharma, Son Of Late Shri Bajrang Lal Sharma, Resident Of Village Khilchipur, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 4. Sub Registrar, Sawai Madhopur, Office Of Sub Registrar Sawaimadhopur, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tamoliya [2025:RJ-JP:21387] (2 of 2) [CW-14619/2020] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 21/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the original suit has already been decided by learned Trial Court on 13.05.2025, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /65