Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28882 (PNJ)

ISHRAR KHAN v. STATE OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CRWP/1852/2025 · 2025-05-19

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

256 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-W-415-2025 IN/& CRWP-1852-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 19.05.2025 ISHRAR KHAN ... PETITIONER V/S STATE OF CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Ms. Jasleen Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Rahul Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl. P.P. U.T. Chandigarh. * * * RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has approached this Court for quashing/setting aside the impugned order dated 31.01.2025 passed by respondent no.2 whereby the parole applied by the petitioner had been declined. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the parole of the petitioner has been declined primarily on the ground that petitioner has no permanent address. He submitted that the petitioner has placed on record the Aadhar Card of the petitioner and that of his wife. It is submitted that though the address of the petitioner as recorded in the Aadhar Card is of U.P. but his wife Sarveen is residing in Mohali and her address is House No. 51, New Defence Colony, Baltana, SAS Nagar (Mohali), Punjab. It is submitted that the petitioner, if granted parole, would live with his JANKI BHATT 2025.05.22 20:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh CRM-W-415-2025 IN/& -2- CRWP-1852-2025 (O&M) wife at the address given in SAS Nagar, Mohali. 3. Learned State counsel submits that the permanent address of the petitioner was earlier verified and he was not found to be residing at that address. But now the petitioner has placed on record the address of his wife and it has been contended that the petitioner if allowed parole, would live with his wife at the address given. 4. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 31.01.2025 is set aside. The respondent-authorities are directed to consider the application filed by the petitioner afresh within a period of four weeks from today keeping in view the address given of his wife of SAS Nagar, Mohali. 5. Disposed of. 19.05.2025 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) Janki JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.05.22 20:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh