IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81795 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== Veena Kunwar @ Veena Devi W/O Late Bhagwan Chaudhary R/O Village- Bisunpur, P.S- Karakat and Distt.- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8570 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== HIRALAL CHAUDHARY S/o- LATE MUNESHWAR CHAUDHARY Resident of Village- Bishunpur Police Station-Karakat District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21093 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2024 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ramesh Chaudhary S/O Late Butan Chaudhary R/O Village- Koshihan, P.S- Chandi and Distt.- Arrah, Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 81795 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harshit Griyaghey, Advocate Mr. Ankit Griyaghey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8570 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 21093 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harshit Griyaghey, Adv Mr. Ankit Griyaghey, Adv Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81795 of 2024(8) dt.25-06-2025 2/2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 8 25-06-2025 All the three cases are being taken up together as they arise out of the same Police Station case. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APPs for the State. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application in order to surrender before the learned Court below and seek regular bail. If the petitioner surrenders within a period of four weeks, the same shall be considered on its own merits without being prejudiced by the present withdrawal. 4. The present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn. sharun/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T