IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.09 of 2025 ----- Sanjay Kumar Singh, aged about 44 years, s/o Pramanand Singh, R/o-Village Dungo, Gaida, P.O.-Bishnugarh, P.S. Bishnugarh, District-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Alka Tiwari, father’s name not known to the petitioner, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Uma Shankar Singh, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, School Education and Literacy Department Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Utkarsh Gupta, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Director, Primary Education, School Education and Literacy Department Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Hemant Sati, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, District-Sahebganj, Jharkhand. 6. Kumar Harsh, father’s name not known to the petitioner, the District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj, P.O. & P.S. Sahebganj, District-Sahebganj, Jharkhand. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Ashwini Bhushan, A.C. to Sr. SC.-II ----- Order No.04 Date: 07.02.2025 1. The present contempt application has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the Opposite Parties alleging wilful violation of the order dated 21st December, 2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No.6657 of 2023. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the show-cause affidavit dated 21st January, 2025 filed on behalf of the Opposite Party No.5- Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Sahebganj, affidavit of which has been sworn by the District Superintendent of Education, Sahebganj (Opposite Party No.6), this Court is of the view that no case of contempt is made out against the Opposite Parties. The contempt proceeding as against the Opposite Parties is hereby dropped. 3. The contempt application is accordingly disposed of. 4. However, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate recourse(s) as available under law for redressal of his grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/ -2- Cont. Case (Civil) No.09 of 2025