Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28869 (RAJ)

ANAL JIBRILE ANSARI S/O SHRI SHOKAT ALI ANSARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/616/2019 · 2025-01-02

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:118] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 616/2019 Anal Jibrile Ansari S/o Shri Shokat Ali Ansari, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 228 B-1, Wakf Nagar, Dadabari, Kota Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. S.H.O. Police Station Dadbari, Kota, Raj. 3. Samrin (Gudiya) W/o Jainul Altmash (Bhuri) D/o Abdul Sharif, R/o Mahatma Gandhi Colony, Near Canal Phatak, Kota Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishiraj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 02/01/2025 1. This petition was filed for quashing of FIR with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this criminal writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and the entire record of the case may kindly be summoned and FIR No.253/2019 registered at Police Station Dadabari, Kota may kindly be quashed and set-aside, alternatively the S.H.O./I.O. of the Police Station Dadabari, Kota may kindly be directed that the documents annexed with this criminal writ petition may kindly be taken on record by I.O. and the statements of witnesses regarding presence of the petitioner may kindly be recorded by the I.O. of FIR No.253/2019 registered at Police Station Dadabari, Kota and the Respondent/Investigating Agency may kindly be investigate the matter fairly and impartially. [2025:RJ-JP:118] (2 of 2) [CRLW-616/2019] Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper, be passed in the interest of justice and to grant adequate relief to the humble petitioner. Costs of this writ petition may also be awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 01.12.2019, which shows that after investigation, charge- sheet was filed for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 323 & 506 of IPC against the petitioner and during investigation the petitioner was also arrested. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that as the petition was for quashing of FIR and for fair investigation and also the charge-sheet has been filed after completion of the investigation, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 4. The factual report is taken on record. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that this petition has become infructuous, the same is disposed of as having become infructuous. 6. All the pending application(s) stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /65