SUNITA JAISWAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/1001/2025 · 2025-03-11
Piyush Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28863 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36385
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1001 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunita Jaiswal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhavendra Singh,Radhe Shyam Gupta,Sanjeev Singh,Sheo Kinkar Singh,Suryaprakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarified that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the law.
Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad