Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 28858 (RAJ)
RAMPATI DEVI W/O LATE SH. JAGDISH PRASAD v. FIROJ KHAN S/O NAZIR KHAN
CMA/4862/2019 · 2025-08-08
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28858 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28858 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30663] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4862/2019
1. Rampati Devi W/o Late Sh. Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Raiger Mohalla, Near Gurudwara, Gangapur City District Sawaimadhopur
2. Ladli Devi W/o Late Sh. Buddha Ram, Aged About 71 Years, Resident Of Raiger Mohalla, Near Gurudwara, Gangapur City District Sawaimadhopur ----Appellants Versus
1. Firoj Khan S/o Nazir Khan, Age 37 Years, Resident Of Hammir Nagar, Kherda Tonk Road, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur (Driver Truck Regd. No. Rj 14/ Gb 7424)
2. Aarif Khan S/o Asad Khan, Age 37 Years, Resident Of House No. 344, Power House Road, Jung Ka Kunwa Thana Kotwali, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur (Owner Truck Regd. No. Rj 14/ Gb 7424)
3. United India Insurance Co.ltd. Through Manager, Branch Tonk, Regional Office Near Idbi Bank, Indira Colony, Bajariya Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kawal Singh Loha, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Yadav, Adv. Mr. Amar Nath Pareek, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 08/08/2025 vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku U;k;ky; eksVj nq?kZVuk okn U;k;kf/kdj.k lokbZ ek/kksiqj ¼jkt0½ }kjk Dyse vkosnu la[;k 14@2018 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 16-02-2019 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku dks e`rd txnh”k lksuoky dh okgu nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i dqy 6]53]704@& #i;s dk vokMZ 8 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k] ftlesa c<ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq ;g vihy is'k dh x;h gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:30663] (2 of 2) [CMA-4862/2019] vkjksfir okgu ds Lokeh] pkyd vFkok chek daiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku dk ;g lhfer fuosnu gS fd e`rd dh ekrk vihykFkhZ Øe&02 dks dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa dksbZ jkf”k ugha fnykbZ xbZ gS] vr% ;Fkksfpr :i ls izfrdj jkf”k c<+k, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh }kjk v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dks fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq;s vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA tgka rd dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu dk iz'u gS] ijaijkxr “kh’kZd esa 15]000@& #i;s vafre laLdkj ds fy, o 15]000@& #i;s laink dh gkfu ds rFkk dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa 40]000@& #i;s e`rd dh iRuh dks fnyk, x, gSa] fdarq e`rd dh ekrk ds fy, bl en esa dksbZ jkf”k ugha fnykbZ xbZ gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.
Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa izfrikfnr fl)kar ds vuqlkj e`rd dh ekrk Hkh 40]000@& #i;s dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa izkIr djus dh vf/kdkjh gSA vr% vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukafdr 16-02-2019 dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ jkf'k ds vfrfjDr bl vkns'k ds rgr vihykFkhZ@nkosnkjku 40]000@& :i;s rFkk ml ij v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 7 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls jkf'k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gksaxsA v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /28