Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:30147
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 3321 of 2021
Seema Kumari
… … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Jitendra Kumar Mehta
…… Opposite Parties
-------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
-------
For the Petitioner : None For the State
: Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P
---
08/25.09.2025 None appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned A.P.P is present.
This application has been preferred by the petitioner for cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party no.2 in A.B.A. No.454 of 2021 and the ground which has been taken in this application is suppression of some material
facts with respect to the demand of dowry and the deposit of an amount of Rs.2,80,000/- on two separate dates in the account of the father of the opposite party no.2 by way of cheques.
It appears from the perusal of the order dated 04.03.2021 passed in A.B.A. No.454 of 2021 that consideration has been made with respect to the persistent demand of dowry from the side of the opposite party no.2 as also the suit for dissolution of marriage having been preferred by the petitioner being M.T.S. No.46 of 2020. The petitioner has failed to bring on record any such material which would implore this Court to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the opposite party no.2.
On consideration of the above, this application stands dismissed.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/-