1 APHC010411462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21496/2025 Between: 1. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA PEDDAIAH, S/O. LATE PEDDAANKANNA, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 2. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA SALU PEDDAIAH,, S/O. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA ANJANEYULU,, S/O. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA VIGNESWARUDU,, S/O. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 5. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA ARJUNUDU,, S/O. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6. SANJAMALA @ CHALLA VENKATAMMA,, W/O. LATE PEDDA ANKANNA, AGED 88 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPTD. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS 2 VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 3. THES H O, PANYAM P.S., PANYAM, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. BOJJA VENKATESWARLU, SON OF B. VENKATA, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O. KORATAMADDI VILLAGE, GADIVEMULA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a Writ in the Nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide Police Aid for implementing the perpetual injunction order dt.30.04.2025 in OS.No. 551/2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal duly considering the petitioners complaint dt. 9 .7.2025 in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to provide police aid for implementing the perpetual injunction order dt.30.04.2025 in OS.No. 551/2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal duly considering the petitioners complaint dt. 9.7.2025 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21496 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue appropriate writ order or direction more particularly a Writ in the Nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to provide Police Aid for implementing the perpetual injunction order dt.30.04.2025 in O.S.No.551/2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal duly considering the petitioners complaint dated 09.7.2025 in the interest of justice and pass…” 2. Heard Sri M.Balasubrahmanyam, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they have filed a suit for permanent injunction against the unofficial respondent and obtained decree vide order dated 30.04.2025 in O.S.No. 551 of 2016 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that they have preferred Execution Petition before the Court and that was returned on some defects. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate Orders since, it is a matter of civil disputes and the subject property is not situated within the jurisdiction of the respondent No.3. 4 5. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to pursue their remedies before the Executing Court where the Execution Petition is preferred. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.08.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No. 21496 of 2025 Dated.20.08.2025 UPS 88