[2025:RJ-JP:13074] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10596/2024 Anil Kumar Jangir S/o Sagar Mal Jangir, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Malsisariya Ke Faram Ke Pass, Ward No. 15, Station Road, Chirava, Police Thana Chirava, Jhunjhunu. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP, Mr. Anish Bhadala for Mr. Rajat Solanki for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.405/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet has already been produced before the concerned Court. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. The matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and [2025:RJ-JP:13074] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10596/2024] trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner deceitfully received Rs.22,00,000/- from the complainant in the pretext of selling the flat in Lotus Residency. The accused-petitioner was representative of Lotus Residency and obtained Rs.22,00,000/- from the complainant and did not deposit the said amount in the company and also not returned the amount to the complainant, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the allegations5 levelled against the accused- petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/20