APHC010411432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ?h-: WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21820 OF 2025 Between: 1. Tarigonda Shanawaz, S/o. late T. Abdul Rasool Aged about 66 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Bypass Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 2. Tarigonda Saleem, S/o. late T. Abdul Rasool, years,R/o. Syed Street, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 3. Tarigonda Ismail, S/o. late T. Abdul Rasool Aged about 61 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Bypass Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 4. Shaik Akhthar Jan, D/o. late T. Abdul Rasool, W/o. Shaik Fakruddin, Aged about 54 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 5. Chotima @ Gundluru Hajira Bee, W/o. G.Abdul Subhan Saheb, D/o.late T. Abdul Rasool, Aged about 78 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. Shameeriya Street, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 6. Rahmath, W/o. Ehasanullah, D/o.late T. Abdul Rasool, Aged about 68 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o. Penukonda Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. Aged about 60 7. Tarigonda Afsar, S/o. late T. Sayyad, Aged about 51 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Shameerya Street, Mundy Bazar, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 8. Tarigonda Shabbir, S/o.late T. Sayyad, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Business, R/o. Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 9. Tarigonda Sajid, S/o. late T. Abdul Gafoor, Aged about 46 years, Occ. Private employee, R/o. Shameerya Street, Mundy Bazar, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Puttaparthy, Sri Satya Sai District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer(RDO), Kadiri, Sri Satya Sai District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kadiri Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. 5. Tarigonda Khadar Basha, S/o late T. Abdul Rasool, Aged about 65 years, Occ. Business, R/o.D.No.8-198, Shameeriya Street, Valisab Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 6. T. Ahammed Basha, S/o.Tarigonda Khadar Basha, Aged about 38 years, Occ. Business, R/o.D.No.8-198, Shameeriya Street, Valisab Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 7. T. Shameer, S/o.Tarigonda Khadar Basha, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Business, R/o.D.No.8-198, Shameeriya Street, Valisab Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. 8. T. Muzammil, , S/o.Tarigonda Khadar Basha, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Business, R/o.D.No.8-198, Shameeriya Street, Valisab Road, Kadiri Town and Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District. ...RESPONDENTS r Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of Respondents No.2 to 4 in considering petitioners representations/applications dated. 17-07-2025 and 28-07-2025 restraining to act upon or process any application for issuance of patta passbooks, mutations, or registrations in respect of the ancestral undivided land admeasuring Ac.2.09 Cents in Survey No.708-5 of Kummaravandlapalle Grama Polam, Kadiri Revenue Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District based on the Partition deed document No.7119/2021 dated.29-07-2021 or any other document executed by Respondent No.5 in favour of his sons i.e.. Respondents No.6 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary, fraudulent, and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the procedure contemplated under The A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 4 not change the revenue entries in respect of the ancestral undivided land admeasuring Ac.2.09 Cents in Survey No.708-5 of Kummaravandlapalle Grama Polam, Kadiri Revenue Village & Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 8: SRI S. KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following order: APHC010411432025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21820/2025 Between: 1.TARIGONDA SHANAWAZ, S/0. LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0. BYPASS ROAD, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 2.TARIGONDA SALEEM,, S/0. LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,R/0. SYED STREET, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.TARIGONDA ISMAIL,, S/0. LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0. BYPASS ROAD, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.SHAIK AKHTHAR JAN, , D/0. LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL, W/O. SHAIK FAKRUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/0. KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 5.CHOTIMA @ GUNDLURU HAJIRA BEE,, W/O. G.ABDUL SUBHAN SAHEB, D/0.LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/0. SHAMEERIYA STREET, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 6.RAHMATH, , W/O. EHASANULLAH, D/0.LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/0. PENUKONDA TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 7.TARIGONDA AFSAR, , S/0. LATE T. SAYYAD, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0. SHAMEERYA STREET, MUNDY BAZAR, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 8.TARIGONDA SHABBIR,, S/O.LATE T. SAYYAD, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/0. KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 9.TARIGONDA SAJID,, S/0. LATE T. ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE. R/0. SHAMEERYA STREET, MUNDY BAZAR, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 2 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PUTTAPARTHY, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISfONAL OFFICERRDO, KADIRI, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 4.THE TAHSILDAR, KADIRI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT. 5.TARIGONDA KHADAR BASHA, , S/0 LATE T. ABDUL RASOOL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.8-198, SHAMEERIYA STREET, VALISAB ROAD. KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 6.T AHAMMED BASHA, S/O.TARIGONDA KHADAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS. OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.8-198, SHAMEERIYA STREET. VALISAB ROAD. KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 7.T SHAMEER, , S/O.TARIGONDA KHADAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.8-198, SHAMEERIYA STREET. VALISAB ROAD, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. 8.T MUZAMMIL, , S/O.TARIGONDA KHADAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.8-198, SHAMEERIYA STREET, VALISAB ROAD, KADIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of Respondents No.2 to 4 in considering petitioners representations/applications dated. 17-07-2025 and 28-07-2025 restraining to act upon or process any application for issuance of patta passbooks, mutations, or registrations in respect of the ancestral undivided land admeasuring Ac.2.09 Cents in Survey No.708-5 of Kummaravandlapal le Grama Polam, Kadiri Revenue Village and Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District based on the Partition deed document No.7119/2021 dated.29-07-2021 or any other document executed by Respondent No.5 in favour of his sons i.e.. Respondents No.6 to 8 as illegal, arbitrary, fraudulent, and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the procedure contemplated under The A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the P' High court may be pleased pleased to direct ^-P^^e “ 4 not change the the revenue No 708-5 of land admeasurmg Ac.ZOO Cents pending disposal of the above writ undivided Kummaravandlapalle Grama Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1 MD SALEEM Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.GP FOR REVENUE 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.21820 of 2025 ORDER:- Pithily this writ petition is filed on the ground that representations dated 17.07.2025 and 28.07.2025 was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the representations, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. The Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh^ held as follows; 2. “...Dispose of the representation mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals, disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute...” Such orders may make for a quick or easy This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities 3. before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a "live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue, stale" issue or dispute, the If it is with reference to a "dead" or Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct (2019) 15 see 613 consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect." any 4. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly innocuous orders directing consideration of representations though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. 5. However, the respondents are directed that the petitioners representations dated 17.07.2025 and 28.07.2025 be considered by examining thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, and communicate the decision to the petitioners. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. no As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAF! assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Puttaparthy, Sri Satya Sai District. ij- T 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer(RDO), Kadiri, Sri Satya Sai District. 4. The Tahsildar, Kadiri Mandal, Sri Satya Sai District. 5. One CC to Sri Md. Saleem, Advocate [OPUC] 6. One CC to Sri S. Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Two CD Copies A ssb HIGH COURT DATED:20/08/2025 ORDER WP No. 21820 OF 2025 5( 0 -i SEP 2025 j|) ntSMtio *y ★ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS