1 2025:CGHC:28955 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6664 of 2025 1 - Kamal Narayan Sharma S/o Shri Amarnath Sharma Aged About 51 Years Posted As Lecturer Govt. H. S. School Junapara Takhatpur Block Takhatpur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bilaspur Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 6675 of 2025 1 - Ramdayal Sahu S/o Shri Ramkishun Sahu Aged About 54 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Boys Middle School Kosmarra Block Kurud District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Education Officer Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.01 19:46:01 +0530 2 WPS No. 6697 of 2025 1 - Digambar Singh Kanwar S/o Shri Chamar Ray Kanwar Aged About 48 Years Working As Teacher (Lb) R/o Nawdha Chowk Sakti, Tahsil And District Sakti Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional A.G. Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy A.G. Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 30/06/2025 1. By way of these writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer orders and action of the respondents, whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teachers and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have joined at their transferred place. It is further submitted that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the Rationalization Instructions and the same is arbitrary, as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, and if the petitioners are not granted relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further submit that the petitioners still want to pursue their 3 representation before the concerned authorities to redress their grievances. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioners have been transferred under the Rationalization Instructions issued by the State Government. It is further submitted that, if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation, in accordance with law, within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and thereafter, the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of 05 days from the date of receipt of representation, in accordance with law, in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petitions stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved