Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28835 (HP)

STATE OF HP v. Usha Devi

LPA/298/2025 · 2025-06-17

Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia, Ranjan Sharma

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:18531 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA LPA No.298 of 2025 Decided on: 17.06.2025 __________________________________________________________ State of Himachal Pradesh and others .....Appellants Versus Usha Devi and another ……Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the appellants: Mr. Gobind Korla, Additional Advocate General. For the respondents: Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate, for respondent No.1. None for respondent No.2. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge [Oral] The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 02.07.2024 passed by learned Single Judge in CWP No.705 of 2020 titled as Usha Devi Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. Finding similarity of the petitioner Villam Singh in CWP No.2467 of 2015 titled as Villam Singh Versus State of H.P. & Ors., decided on 07.04.2016, respondents have been directed to pay to the petitioner grant-in-aid in accordance with law from the date of his appointment. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:18531 - 2 - 2. It is apt to record that LPA No.53 of 2018, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. Versus Villam Singh preferred by the State against judgment in Villam Singh’s case [supra], was dismissed by the Division Bench of this High Court on 26.11.2018. SLP No.19103 of 2019, preferred by the State against the judgment passed in LPA No.53 of 2018 also stands dismissed by Supreme Court on 09.08.2019. 3. The issue involved in the present petition is no longer res integra. 4. In view of above, we do not find any merit in the appeal and appeal is dismissed. 5. We consider it fit to record that State is preferring the appeals despite dismissal of their similar appeals in identical matters. Such conduct is not in consonance with the Litigation Policy adopted by the State of HP which is causing wasting the time and energy of the State as well as the Court. It may invite imposing cost but taking lenient view, no cost is being imposed. 6. An identical Letters Patent Appeal, i.e. LPA bearing No.122 of 2025, titled as State of Himachal Pradesh & Others Versus Hans Raj & 2025:HHC:18531 - 3 - Another, has also been dismissed by this Court, vide judgment dated 27.03.2025. 7. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge June 17, 2025 [Bhardwaj]