r APHC010410622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES|4' AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) V MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ts.il % PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAQ^ WRIT PETITION NO: 21007 OF 2025 Between: Kunchambalam Ramadevi Alias Singamreddy Ramadevi, W/o. Kunchambalam Gari Prasad Reddy, aged about 48 years, R/o. Thollaganganapalli Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Guntur District Andhra Pradesh. 2. The District Collector, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Joint Collector, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District. 5. The Tahsildar, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 6. The Grampanchayat, Represented by its Secretary, Thollaganganapalli Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District ...Respondents.-' Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and trying to dispossess the petitioner more particularly respondent no. 5 without considering representation , dated 30.07.2025 made by the petitioner pursuant to notice, Index number B/444/2025, dated 19.07.2025 in regard to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sy.No. 89/5B in Thollaganganapalli Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District illegal and arbitrary and apart from being violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed to us under Articles 14,19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents particularly respondent no. 5 to not interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment to an extent of Ac.2.00 cents in Sy.No.89/5B in Thollaganganapalli Village, Vallur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District and enjoyment. ^ lA NO: 1 OF 2025 / Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondent no.5 to consider the explanation, dated;30.07.2025. ^ lA NO: 2 OF 2025^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondent no.5 to not interfere with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI M SUDHIR (SC FOR ZPPS, MPPS &GP) The Court made the following order: APHC010410622025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21007/2025 Between: 1.KUNCHAMBALAM RAMADEVI ALIAS SINGAMREDDY RAMADEVI, W/0. KUNCHAMBALAM GARI PRASAD REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/0. THOLLAGANGANAPALLI VILLAGE, VALLUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KADAPA,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA,YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5.THE TAHSILDAR, VALLUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6.THE GRAMPANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THOLLAGANGANAPALLI VILLAGE,VALLUR MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to pass an order or direction more particularly one in the J of the Respondents dispossess the petitioner , dated in nf Writ Of Mandamus declaring the action With zt. 89/5rm%to°aganganapal« W. and apart f the Constitution Respondents particulariy respondent na peaceful possession and enjoyment to - in Thollaganganapalli Village, 30 B/444/2025 Sy.No. District illegal and arbitrary rights guaranteed to us under of India and consequently direct the 5 to not interfere P® sy.No.89/5B in Vaiiur Mandal, V^K Kadapa Oistrict and enjoyment and to pass extent an IANOi±OL2025 ircumstances stated Court may be pleased to consider the petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c, ,dated:30.07.2025 and pass , the High no.5 to in direct explanation fvin- 2 OF 202,5 ina that in the circumstances stated Court may be pleased to not interfere with the .,«»d id „,5 „ ion and enjoyment and pass in the direct the respondents petitioner's peaceful possession Counsel for the Petitioner; THANJAVURU VENKATA SUMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 1. y 3 THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO. 21007 of 707^ RAO ORDER: Pithily this writ petition is filed on the grounds that made to the authorities, but it the respondents be directed to address the would suffice in the circumstances of the a representation was was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that representation, as such direction case. 2. In the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India P. Venkatesh reported in (2019) 15 SCO 613 held that: vs "Dispose of the representation’ mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals, for a quick or easy disposal of cases in But, they do not service to the Such orders may make overburdened adjudicatory institutions, cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute. 3. This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing consideration" of a claim the claim or representation is with reference to a "live" i with reference to a "dead or representation should examine whether I issue or whether it is or "stale" issue. If it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue or dispute, the Court/Tribunal should and should not direct consideration put an end to the matter or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding to direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should will be without prejudice to any make it clear that such consideration 4 delay and laches. Even If the Court does . that would be the legal position and effect. contention relating to limitation or not expressly say so orders directing easy disposal of but such orders do more by seemingly innocuous 4. Disposal of proceedings consideration of representation cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions though resuit in quick or disservice than service to the cause of justice. directed that the petitioner's considered by the respondents, and communicate the decision will be However, the respondents dated 30.07.2025 must be orders accordingly are 5. representation examined thoroughly, issue It goes without saying that the entire process given to the petitioner, completed within six is received. ix weeks from the date of the order is , the Writ Petition is disposed of. Till the authority shall not evict the order as to costs. 6. With the above observation disposal of the representation, the respondent the subject land. There shall be no petitioner from As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous shall stand Petitions pending, if any Sdl- M RAMESH BABU deputy registrar closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Department Secretariat Buildings 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Velagapudi Guntur District Andhra Pradesh. 2 The District Collector, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District. 3 The Joint Collector, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa,YSR Kadapa DistCk: 4 5. The Tahsildar, Valiur Mandal, YSR Kadapa District :r— ur TF high court DATED:1 1/08/2025 l ORDER WP NO. 21007 OF 2025 disposing of the W.P., WITHOUT COSTS