[2025:RJ-JP:6474] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14011/2024 Mr. Randhir Kapoor S/o Late Shri Prem Kapoor, Aged About 54 Years, 1317/18, Hanuman Mandir Gali, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi- 110031. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department And Library Department And Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education) Department, Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 2. The State Project Director C/o Samagra Shiksha (Smsa) And Commissioner, Rajasthan Council Of School Education And Commissioner (School Education Jaipur), Department And Panchayati Raj (Elementary Education) Department, Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 3. The Additional State Project Director C/o Samagra Shiksha (Smsa) And Joint Commissioner, Rajasthan School Shiksha Parishad, Jaipur Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 4. Financial Advisor (Fa) C/o Samagra Shiksha (Smsa), Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 5. Deputy Commissioner, Vocational Training, Rajasthan School Shiksha Parishad, Jaipur, Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 6. Deputy Director, Vocational Education, Dr. S Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Jln Marg, Jaipur- 302017. 7. Minister Of School Education, Government Of Rajasthan, 4-E-7, Rangbari Yojana, Rangbari Road, Kota, Rajasthan- 324005. 8. Central Vigilance Commissioner, Satarkata Bhavan, A- Block, Gpo Complex, Ina, New Delhi- 110023. [2025:RJ-JP:6474] (2 of 2) [CW-14011/2024] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Palash Srivastava For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akash Gupta, Mr. Punit Singhvi Mr. Lokrendra Sharma, Mr. Utkansh Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 13/02/2025 By way of instant writ petition, challenge was made to the tender process, but during course of the writ petition, the contractual work awarded to the private respondent, pursuant to the impugned tender, has been completed and in that view, petitioner does not want to pursue the writ petition. Respondents have no objection. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Application(1/2024) filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC by the successive bidder and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /73