( 1 ) FA-11884-25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10136 OF 2025 IN FAST/11884/2025 VILAS S/O MAROTIRAO PAWAR VERSUS SHAHAJIRAO S/O DASHRATHRAO KADAM … Mr. P. S. Dikle, Advocate for the applicant …. CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATE : 26.09.2025 PER COURT :- 1. Motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of order dated 18th September 2025. 2. Mr. Dikle, learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 18.09.2025, time of two weeks was granted to remove the office objections. He further submits that, in view of the objections raised by the Registry, corrections are required to be carried out in the judgment and award itself in the Tribunal. Therefore, instead of two weeks, a longer period is necessary for compliance. 3. In view of the above, the applicant prays that the time granted in the order dated 18th September 2025 be amended from “two weeks” to “eight weeks.” 4. The order dated 18th September 2025 is accordingly corrected to read “eight weeks” instead of “two weeks.” 5. Motion stands disposed of. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] PRW This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //