119 119 119 119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CWP CWP CWP CWP----5119 5119 5119 5119----2025 2025 2025 2025 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : Date of decision : 22222222.04 .04 .04 .04.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 Daya Chand ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Divyam Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana and Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL DEEPAK SIBAL, J. , J. , J. , J. (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, Panipat to take a decision on the representation dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P-2), submitted by the petitioner. 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P- 2), submitted by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. [DEEPAK SIBAL] [DEEPAK SIBAL] [DEEPAK SIBAL] [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 22222222.04 .04 .04 .04.2025 .2025 .2025 .2025 [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] [HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN] atulsethi JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No ATUL SETHI 2025.04.25 16:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judgment/order Chandigarh