LAL CHAND AND ANOTHER v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
OMPM/35/2025 · 2025-07-28
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28809 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28809 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Lal Chand & Anr. Vs. UOI & Ors.
OMP(M) No.35 of 2025 28.07.2025 Present: Mr. Ankush Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Vinay Thakur, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants.
Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Central Govt. Counsel, for respondent No.1.
Ms. Sneh Bhimta, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3.
Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.4.
OMP(M) No.35 of 2025 Reply to the application has not been filed. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings. The applicants/appellants have shown sufficient cause for condoning the delay as occurred in filing the appeal. Accordingly, this application is allowed. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. Arb. Appeal No. of 2025 Be registered. List for consideration after four weeks.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 28, 2025
Judge
Mukesh