AJAY KUMAR AND ANR. v. STATE TH. SECY.REVENUE DEPTT. AND ORS.
OWP/392/2019 · 2025-03-26
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2880 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2880 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM No. 833/2025 in OWP No. 392/2019
Ajay Kumar and Anr.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Prem Sadotra, Advocate
q
vs
State of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 26.03.2025
Keeping in view CM No. 833/2025, petitioner No. 1 has left for the heavenly abode. Mr. Prem Sadotra, learned counsel appearing for petitioner No. 2, submits that he has instructions not to proceed any further in the matter as his grievance stands addressed.
In view of the above, the instant petition, in so far as petitioner No. 1 is concerned, is abated. However, the instant petition stands dismissed as withdrawn in respect of petitioner No. 2.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu 26.03.2025 Sushant
237