Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 288 (UTT)

SMT. GURVINDER KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION

WPMS/2539/2018 · 2026-03-23

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.2721 of 2025 Sonam …………Petitioner Vs. District Magistrate and others ……….Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned S.C. for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 4. Permission so sought is granted. 5. Accordingly writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn subject to payment of a cost of ₹10,000/- to be recovered from the petitioner within a period of one month from today by way of arrears of land revenue to be deposited in the High Court Bar Association Advocates Welfare Fund, Nainital. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 25.03.2026 SK