Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:19640 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CARBC No. 82 of 2025 Decided on: 25.06.2025 Ramesh Chand
… Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner : M/s Y.P. Sood and Praveen Chauhan, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) This is a petition preferred by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim directions. Interim protection was granted to the petitioner on
26.12.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that till date no steps have been taken for the appointment of an Arbitrator.
2. In the light of this fact as the petition has lost its efficacy as needful has not been after the passing of the interim
order within the time period stipulated in the Act itself for the appointment of Arbitrator, the petition is dismissed as such. Interim
order stands vacated. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 25, 2025 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?