Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28798 (AP)

M/S.REAL FAB, REP MANG PARTNER, IDA AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM v. M/S. VISWAKARMA GEOTECH PVT LTD, REP BY M.D., VISAKHAPATNAM

AS/671/2008 · 2025-07-28

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.671 OF 2008) APHC010410312008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM FIRST APPEAL NO: 671/2008 Between: 1. M/S.REAL FAB, REP MANG PARTNER, IDA AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, KARUNAKAR RAO PLOT NO. 183, BLOCK -D, IDA, AUTONAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 12. ...APPELLANT AND 1. M/S VISWAKARMA GEOTECH PVT LTD REP BY M D VISAKHAPATNAM, Rep by its M.D., S.V.Ramana Rao, Rep by its Authorised Agent Arji Ramakrishna, S/o. Late Talupulu, Aged: 45 years, Nandini Apartments, ...RESPONDENT pleased to allow the First Appeal. IA NO: 2 OF 2008(ASMP 7874 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K.S.G. PADMAVATHI 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.671 OF 2008) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/defendant, challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2007 passed in O.S.No.37 of 2001 on the file of the VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam, filed by the plaintiffs/respondent, seeking recovery of money. 2. On 08.07.2025, the following order was passed “At the request of K.S.G.Padmavathi, learned counsel for the respondent/s, the matter is adjourned. 2. As last opportunity, post the matter on 29.07.2025. No further adjournment will be granted, as the matter pertains to the year 2008..” 3. Today also, there is no representation on either side. 4. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed “for want of prosecution”. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 29.07.2025. RPD. 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J A.S. NO.671 OF 2008) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) APPEAL SUIT NO: 671 of 2008 Date: 29.07.2025 RPD.