[2025:RJ-JP:34559] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12983/2025 Rohitash Kumar S/o Shri-Nagarmal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o- Bad Ki Dhani, Gudha Godaji, Dist- Jhunjhunu, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur, Raj 2. The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Head Office, Jaipur. Raj. 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Jhunjhunu Depot, Raj ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 29/08/2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on account of his arrest in a criminal case No. 445/2024, for committing offences under Sections 115(2), 127(2), 85, 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023, the petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 20.12.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner has been released on bail on 24.12.2024 in the aforesaid criminal case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that till date, no charge-sheet whatsoever has been issued to the petitioner and despite lapse of more than eight months, till date the respondents have not reviewed the suspension order. [2025:RJ-JP:34559] (2 of 2) [CW-12983/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner places reliance upon the judgment delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India & Anr. reported in 2015 (7) SCC 291 as well as on the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ No.4276/2018 (Manvendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 21.12.2018 4. In the light of above, where even after lapse of more than eight months and without even issuing charge-sheet, the respondents have not yet reviewed the suspension order. This Court deems it just and proper to direct the petitioner to make a representation before the respondents No.1 & 2 with a request to review the aforesaid suspension order, who shall pass speaking order on such representation within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of the instant order. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. 7. The writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/12