Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28794 (HP)

RAJ PAUL SHARMA v. STATE OF HP

CMP-T/8/2025 · 2025-03-03

Satyen Vaidya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Raj Paul Sharma vs. State of H.P. & others CWPOA No.6108 of 2020 03.03.2025 Present: Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pratush Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Jai Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.4 and 5. CMP-T No.8 of 2025 An application for early hearing has been filed on the ground that the petitioner has retired during the pe ndency of the petition and for non-grant of the relief prayed in the instant petition, he is not getting the pensionary benefits. Petitioner has made out a case for early hearing. List the petition for hearing on 2nd April, 2025. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge March 03, 2025 (vt)