Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28794 (AP)

Gadde Radhakrishna Kumari v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,

WP/25301/2013 · 2025-06-24

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010410782013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25301/2013 Between: 1. GADDE RADHAKRISHNA KUMARI, W/O RAMA KRISHNA, AGED 45 YEARS, CULTIVATION R/O GANAPAVARAM VGAGE, BUTTAIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDYGUDEM WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT, 2. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, BUTTAIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT, 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BUTTAIGUDEM POLICE STATION WEST GODAWARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issued a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 1 & 2 respondents not directing the 4th respondent to provide protection to the lands of the petitioner to an extent of Ac. 06.00 cents (Ac. 05.43 cents) in R.S. No. 256/10 situated at Reddyganapavaram Village of Buttaigudem Mandal, when there is threat of dispossession from the local schedule tribe people, is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to provide protection to the land of the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 31214 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide protection to the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac. 6.00 cents (Ac. 5.43 cents) in R.S. No.256/10 situated at Reddyganapavaram Village of Buttaigudem Mandal whenever required Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARAM NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. 3. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondents 1 and 2 in not providing protection to the lands of the petitioner of an extent of Ac.6.00 cents (Ac.5.43 cents) in R.S.No.256/10 of Reddyganapavaram village of Buttaigudem Mandal. 2. Notice was ordered on 11.09.2013 and no interim order was granted. 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by afflux of time, cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is Closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD