[2025:RJ-JP:36297] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10659/2025 Durg Singh S/o Bhoorisingh, Resident Of Kunkuta, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11074/2025 1 . Sanjay @ K.k. S/o Vinay Kumar, Resident Of Kunkuta, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 2 . Pulin S/o Vinay Kumar, Resident Of Kunkuta, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain, Ms. Tanisha Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP, Mr. Chandra Kant Chauhan for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/09/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.198/2025 registered at [2025:RJ-JP:36297] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10659/2025] Police Station Baseri, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 351(2) and 352 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the FIR. It is alleged against the petitioner- Durg Singh, that he used the fire arm, however, no recovery of any fire arm was effected at the instance of petitioner- Durg Singh. The fire arm was recovered from the possession of petitioner- Pulin. The police has not recovered any bullet or pallets from the place of occurrence. The injuries sustained to all the injured were found to be simple blunt in nature. The accused- petitioners are in custody since 27.07.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed these bail applications and contended that the petitioners used fire arm and caused injuries to injured Arif, Janu and Arun Khan. The recovery of fire arm was effected from the petitioner- Pulin. The petitioners are also having criminal antecedents and against them, criminal cases under various offences have been registered, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and after going through the factual report, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:36297] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10659/2025] 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Durg Singh S/o Bhoorisingh, 2. Sanjay @ K.k. S/o Vinay Kumar, and 3. Pulin S/o Vinay Kumar, in connection with FIR No.198/2025 registered at Police Station Baseri, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioners namely: 1. Sanjay @ K.K. and 2. Pulin are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/91-92