[2025:RJ-JP:3472] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10557/2024 Chhoti D/o Shri Chhinga W/o Shri Pyarelal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Magjani, Karauli, Presently Resident Of Gadka Ki Chowki Karauli, Police Station Kotwali Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv., with Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP and Mr. Manish K. Saini, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/01/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.277/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Karauli, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is a female, who has already joined the investigation in terms of order dated 19.12.2024. He further submits that essentially, there was a civil dispute between the parties and same has been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that [2025:RJ-JP:3472] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10557/2024] custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise between the parties. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and especially the fact that the petitioner is a female, who has already joined the investigation; there was a civil dispute between the parties and same has been resolved by the parties amicably, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre- arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kotwali Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) in FIR No.277/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner - Chhoti D/o Shri Chhinga W/o Shri Pyarelal, she shall be released on bail, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2025:RJ-JP:3472] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10557/2024] (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/288