( 2025:JHHC:19557 ) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 13 of 2025 With I.A. No. 13767 of 2024 & I.A. No. 2121 of 2025 The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office at Nalanda Hotel, P.O. & P.S.-Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum, represented through Poonam Tete (Deputy Manager), D/o Henry Innocent Tete, posted at United India Insurance Company Ltd, Divisional Office, Ranchi, Vyapar Bhawan, Floor No.1, Lalji Hirji Road, P.O.- Ranchi, P.S.- Daily Market, District- Ranchi. ....... Appellant Versus 1. Soda Lakra, S/o Late Madhu Lakra, R/o Noamundi Mahudi Pachay Sai Kotagarh, Noamundi Bazar, P.O. & P.S.- Noamundi, District- West Singhbhum. 2. Om Sai Construction, I/c Ranjit Kumar Mishra, at Duplex No. 44, Gayatri House, Baliguma, near Green City, P.O. & P.S.- MGN, Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum. ....... Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Appellant : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Resp. No. 2 : Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate --- 05/ Dated: 17.07.2025 1. This appeal has been preferred against the Award dated 9.8.2024 passed in Motor Accident Claim Case No. 63 of 2023 by learned District Judge-II-cum- Presiding Officer, M.V.A.C.T., East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the claimant- respondent no. 1 herein has filed Execution Case No. 02 of 2025, arising out of Motor Accident Claim Case No. 63 of 2023 before the learned Tribunal and the said Execution Case No. 02 of 2025 was sent before the National Lok Adalat, wherein the matter between the claimant and owner of the vehicle, who is respondent no.2 herein, has been settled at Rs. 3,00,000/- as full and final compensation amount. Learned counsel further submits that the said amount has already been received by the claimant-respondent no. 1. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2 submits that a supplementary affidavit enclosing the order of National Lok Adalat ( 2025:JHHC:19557 ) 2 and joint compromise petition have been filed, which show that the claimant has already received the awarded amount as full and final compensation. 4. In view of the said supplementary affidavit, learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw this appeal. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. This miscellaneous appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 7. Consequently, the pending interlocutory applications stand disposed of. 8. The statutory amount deposited by the appellant-Insurance Company shall be returned back to the appellant. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) R.Kr