Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 28770 (RAJ)
KAMLA DEVI S/O LATE GOPAL LAL v. JYOTI PRAKASH SHARMA S/O PRATAP CHAND SHARMA
CMA/2117/2021 · 2025-08-21
Uma Shanker Vyas
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28770 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28770 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2117/2021
1. Kamla Devi S/o Late Gopal Lal, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Dei, Tehsil Nainwa Distt. Bundi (Raj.). 2. Mukesh Kumar S/o Late Gopal Lal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Dei, Tehsil Nainwa Distt. Bundi (Raj.). ----Appellants Versus
1. Jyoti Prakash Sharma S/o Pratap Chand Sharma, R/o Chak Chainpura, Sahu Nagar, Bajariya Sawaimadhopur Tehsil And Distt. Sawaimadhopur (Raj.). 2. M/s New Malwa Transport Company, 464 Kamla Nahru Colony, Bhatinda (Punjab)
3. United India Insurance Company Limted, Near Dr. Kalra, First Floor Vakra Chock, Talwandi, Bhatinda Present Address At Nbcc Center, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv. for Mr. Vimal Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajeev Bhushan Bansal, Adv. HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order 21/08/2025 vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dh vksj ls ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] Vksad }kjk Dyse ;kfpdk la[;k&200@2019 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 15-09-2021 ls O;fFkr gksdj is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku ds i{k esa vyx&vyx enksa esa dqy 3]80]128@& :i;s dk vokMZ e; 7-5 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr fnyk;s tkus dk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gSA [2025:RJ-JP:33159] (2 of 4) [CMA-2117/2021] vkjksfir okgu Lokeh] pkyd vFkok chek daiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA vkjksfir okgu ls nq?kZVuk gksuk] mlesa pkyd dh ykijokgh gksuk rFkk ;g okgu izR;FkhZ chek daiuh ds ;gka chfer gksuk fooknjfgr gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dk fuosnu gS fd vk; gkfu o dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnykbZ xbZ izfrdj jkf'k vi;kZIr gS] vr% ;Fkksfpr :i ls izfrdj jkf'k c<+k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ chek daiuh dk fuosnu gS fd e`rd ij ek= mldh iRuh gh vkfJr Fkh] iq= o;Ld gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ,d O;fDr ds vkfJr gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, e`rd ds thou fuokZg [kpZ dh jkf'k 1@2 dh dVkSrh fd;k tkuk mfpr gS] var vihyk/khu fu.kZ; o vokMZ dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;g vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rd ds vk/kkj&dkMZ ds vuqlkj mldh vk;q 61 o"kZ 3 ekg ekurs gq, 7 dk xq.kd yxk;k x;k gSA e`rd ds dksbZ izekf.kr vk; ugha gS vkSj fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rd dks vdq'ky Jfed ekurs gq, 26 fnu dh etnwjh nj dks fopkj esa ysus ds mijkar 5]538@&:i;s ekfld vk; ekuh gS] tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr y{eh/kj uk;d o vU; cuke tqxyfd'kksj o vU; 2018¼1½ vkj-,-vkj- 45 ,l-lh- rFkk y{ehnsoh o vU; cuke eksgEen rCcj o vU; 2008 ¼2½ Vh-,-lh- 394 ,l-lh- esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj 30 fnu ds vuqlkj izfrdj jkf'k gh fnyk;k tkuk mfpr gSA tgka rd e`rd ds thfor jgus ij O;fDrxr thou fuokZg dh jkf'k ds dVkSrh dk iz'u gS] vihykFkhZ Øe&1 e`rd dh iRuh e`rd ij vkfJr gS] [2025:RJ-JP:33159] (3 of 4) [CMA-2117/2021] ijarq 28 o"khZ; iq= tks Lora= :i ls dk;Z dj jgk gS] e`rd ij vkfJr ugha gks ldrk gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa e`rd ij ek= mldh iRuh gh vkfJr jgrh gSA bl U;k;ky; }kjk S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.
1239/2017 Smt. Sumitra Badaya & Anr. Vs. Vinod Kumar Jairam & Ors. ds ekeys esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 24-01-2025 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd tgka e`rd ij ,d gh O;fDr vkfJr gS rks mlds O;fDrxr [kpsZ ds :i esa 1@2 jkf'k dh dVkSrh fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA mijksDrkuqlkj vk; gkfu ds en esa izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh tkos rks 213x30x12x7x1@2=2]68]380@& :i;s gksrh gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 3]10]128@&:i;s fnyk;s x;s gSa] vr% bl en esa 41]748@& :i;s vf/kd gksus ls dVkSrh fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSaA vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku e`rd iRuh o iq= gSa] ftUgsa dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk dqy 40]000@&:i;s fnyk;s x;s gSa] tcfd Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors.
Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj izR;sd vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku vFkkZr~ iRuh o iq= nksuksa e`rd ls feyus okys izse] Lusg vkfn ls oafpr gksus ds dkj.k dalksfVZ;e dh gkfu ds en esa pkyhl&pkyhl gtkj :i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSa] bl izdkj bl en esa 80]000@& :i;s dh jkf'k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSa] ijarq vk; gkfu ds en esa 41]748@&:i;s vf/kd fnyk;s x;s gSa mls ns[krs gq, 1]748@&:i;s vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dks vf/kd gh izkIr gq, gSa ijarq chek daiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy ugha gksus ds dkj.k ls bl jkf'k dh olwyh dk vkns'k fn;k tkuk mfpr ugha gS ysfdu vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku Hkh izfrdj jkf'k esa c<+ksrjh ds fdlh Hkh :i esa gdnkj ugha gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa vihyk/khu fu.kZ; iq"V gksus rFkk ;g vihy [kkfjt gksus ;ksX; gSA
[2025:RJ-JP:33159] (4 of 4) [CMA-2117/2021] ifj.kker% vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vihyk/khu fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 15-09-2021 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu ,oa vU; dksbZ izkFkZuk&i= ;fn yfEcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA fo}ku vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT /44