Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2877 (UTT)

SUMIT SINGHAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/43/2025 · 2025-02-27

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1374-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMB No. 43 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.N. Babulkar, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned Chief Standing Counsel and Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent nos. 1, 2, 4 & 7. 3. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of even date rendered in Special Appeal No. 16 of 2025, the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. In view of the statement so made on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 27.02.2025 Navin 2025:UHC:1374-DB