Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2877 (JK)

SITA RAM v. REETA DEVI AND OTHERS

LPA/62/2025 · 2025-08-04

Rajesh Sekhri, Rajnesh Oswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU LPA No. 62/2025 In [MA No. 194/2018] CM Nos. 1887/2025 & 1888/2025 Sita Ram …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. M. Aleem Beig, Advocate & Mr. Harmit K. Mehta, Advocate vs Reeta Devi and ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sunny Mahajan, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE ORDER 04.08.2025 1. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks withdrawal of the present appeal with liberty to avail an appropriate remedy as available under law. He further submits that delay in availing the appropriate remedy as available under law be condoned. 2. Needless to say that proper provisions are available in the Limitation Act which take care of submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant and as such, no such direction is required at the end of this Court. 3. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RAJESH SEKHRI) (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE JUDGE Jammu 04.08.2025 Neha-II Serial No. 8 NEHA KUMARI 2025.08.04 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document