IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10140 of 2024 ------- 1. Anand Ray @ Anand Kumar Ray, aged about 52 years, son of Gango Ray @ Gangadhar Ray. 2. Kishan Ray @ Kishan Kumar Ray, aged about 50 years, son of Gango Ray @ Gangadhar Ray. Both resident of village Bihkhodih, P.O. Chitardih, P.S. Jamua, District Giridih. 3. Bablu Ray @ Subhash Chandra Ray, aged about 22 years, son of Shyamsundra Ray of Village Sakho, P.O. & P.S. Devri, District Giridih. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH -------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate -------- 04/ Dated 25.02.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024, S.T. Case No.336 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 325, 307 & 302 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih. On 25.03.2024 at about 11:00 Noon, petitioners and co-accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the parents and grand-parents of the informant. The father of the informant namely Prakash Ray succumbed to his injuries. It was submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioners. It was further submitted that there is allegation against the accused persons to have assaulted Rina Devi but she has not sustained any injury. Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, learned A.P.P on behalf of the State assisted by Mr. Arwind Kumar, learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the trial of the case is going on and five witnesses have been examined. It was further submitted that one witness namely Tarni Devi has stated that petitioners had assaulted the deceased. Considering the fact that during investigation, none of the witnesses have made any specific allegation against the petitioners, I am inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 75 of 2024, S.T. Case No.336 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-