Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28759 (HP)

CHANCHAL KUMARI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/1436/2025 · 2025-03-06

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1380/2025 alongwith connected matters Decided on: 06.03.2025 1. CWP No.1380/2025 Parma Nand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 2. CWP No.1432/2025 Sanjay Prakash …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 3. CWP No.1430/2025 Yogesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 4. CWP No.1434/2025 Kishori Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 5. CWP No.1436/2025 Chanchal Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 6. CWP No.1438/2025 Sushma Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 7. CWP No.1440/2025 Yogesh …Petitioner Versus 2 State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 8. CWP No.1442/2025 Sweety Kapalta …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 9. CWP No.1444/2025 Amit Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 10. CWP No.1446/2025 Purnima …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 11. CWP No.1448/2025 Premlata …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 12. CWP No.1450/2025 Asha Kumari …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 13. CWP No.1452/2025 Arti Kaistha …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 14. CWP No.1454/2025 3 Parkash Chand …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 15. CWP No.1456/2025 Gaurav Sharma …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 16. CWP No.1458/2025 Rajender Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. 17. CWP No.1460/2025 Deepa Thapa …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. 18. CWP No.1462/2025 Mukesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner(s): Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate, proxy counsel, Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 4 For the respondent(s): Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of the writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e. the Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioner(s) be permitted to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to file afresh, in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment. Prayer is accepted. 2. Granting such liberty, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 06th March, 2025(rohit)