Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28757 (JHR)

RAJ KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10089/2024 · 2025-01-13

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8527 of 2024 ------- Sanjay Hazra, aged about 27 years, son of Balram Hajra, resident of village Chatro, P.O. & P.S. Jamua, District Giridih. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party With B.A. No. 10089 of 2024 ------- Raj Kumar Verma, aged about 28 years, son of Rameshwar Mahto, resident of village Behradih, P.O. Siyatand, P.S. Jamua, District Giridih. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party With B.A. No. 10910 of 2024 ------- Md. Mojaffar @ Md. Mojafar, aged about 24 years, son of Kismat Ansari @ Md. Mukhtar, resident of village Pihra Manpur, P.O. Pihra, P.S. Gawan, District Giridih. …... …. Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. …. Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH -------- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Kumar No.1, Advocate Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate Mr. Shyam Sunder Pd. Kushwaha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, A.P. P. Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Ray, Advocate -------- 06/ Dated 13.01.2025 Heard the parties. All these three bail applications arise out of the same police case and as such, these bail applications are being disposed of by this common order. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Deori P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 363, 365, 386, 387 & 364A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Ms. Nikhat Ayesha, learned J.M.F.C., Giridih. The son of the informant namely Pawan Kumar Das was abducted for ransom and after two days, he was rescued. It appears that the petitioners were identified in T.I. Parade by the victim as his abductors. -2- Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that co-accused Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Kumar Ram has been granted bail by this Court in B.A. No.8108/2024. It was further submitted that victim was rescued after two days and no ransom amount was paid. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioners were identified as the abductors and co-accused Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Kumar Ram, who has been granted bail, was not identified by the victim. In view of the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioners, on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected at this stage. (Ambuj Nath, J.) BS/-